User talk:Yann

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyolcak1.jpg

Hi, why did you keep this? Hekerui (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You undeleted it? How do you know it was even published? Guessed? Hekerui (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hekerui: There is a valid license, and old images are considered published unless proved otherwise. Photographs were published when leaving the photographer's custody. Yann (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nyolcak1.jpg. Hekerui (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion

Hello. I am not a rule violator, I have no intention of stealing other people's works or intellectual property and passing them off as my own. If I use images from books or websites, I indicate this. Member Quick1984 unreasonably and massively nominates my files for deletion. Therefore, I ask you to ignore his actions. If there is a need to indicate any data or clarify authorship, I will indicate this data. This is not a problem for me. Please do not rush to delete my files. DigitalSpace (talk) 13:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DigitalSpace: Actually Quick1984 is right. Please read COM:L and do not add wrong information for your uploads. Yann (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay attention to the last action of user "Quick1984", which I regard as harassment. This image is from an Armenian manuscript that was created over 1000 years ago. I have indicated the source and the author. What else should I indicate? DigitalSpace (talk) 17:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DigitalSpace: This is probably OK copyright-wise, but the date and the license are wrong. Please fix that, then you can remove the "no permission" tag. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:22, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is nothing more than an attempt to mislead. Please look at the description at that moment:

Date: 13 December 2024 / Source: История Дагестана, Часть 1., 1980, стр. 19 / Author: Магомедов Р. М. / Licensing: I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Quick1984 (talk) 19:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Republishing an old document doesn't create a new copyright. I agree that the information was initially wrong, but that has been fixed now. Yann (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There were no any indication at that moment, that the work is older than of 1980. And now my request is called harassment, which is definitely not true. Quick1984 (talk) 19:46, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, not harassment, but this is obviously not a 1980 document. Yann (talk) 21:12, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leo XIV

Hi Yann, could you please review recent copyvio uploads:

Quick1984 (talk) 15:12, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pope Leo XIV first Holy Mass.jpg
File:LEV XIV.png
File:Pope Leo XIV as a Cardinal.jpg, sorry to bother you. Quick1984 (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Quick1984: Hi, Please just add a speedy deletion tag. They will be deleted shortly by me or another admin. Yann (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if that were like this. But unfortunately, this election resulted in a parade of violations, some of which remained on the main pages of many wikis for many hours. At least two of them, already tagged for speedy, were not deleted for more than a day. Sorry again, this is not a common situation, it does not happen every day, I would not want Commons to facilitate the mass distribution of copyright violations. Thanks a lot, though. Quick1984 (talk) 15:46, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Demande d'un coup d’œil

Bonsoir Yann,

est-ce que tu peux jeter un coup d’œil sur Special:Contributions/LucPeintre2025? Je ne me sens pas vraiment à l'aise avec ces contributions; je suspecte des copyvios. Il y en a une certaine (File:Patt croqué par Will.jpg), pour les autres peintures et dessins, Google et les signatures n'aident pas, mais mes soupçons ne disparaissent pas pour autant. Ou est-ce que tu vois ça comme un cas de COM:CSD F10? Salutations, Grand-Duc (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

C'est probablement un utilisateur qui n'a pas encore compris le fonctionnement des licenses sur Commons. Il va falloir qu'il contacte VRT, je lui ai laissé un message dans ce sens: Special:Diff/1030069256/1030101674. Salutations, Grand-Duc (talk) 18:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pope Leo XIV 2.jpg

Please restore it immediately. It is not a copyright violation. See my talk page. Regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Christ, can you stop deleting them? https://i.imgur.com/i1oIyzE.jpeg RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7: Is the X account uploader really the author of the ~~video~~picture? I think that the question is valid. But I restored it and created a regular DR instead. Yann (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann, video? It’s a photograph! https://x.com/edgarjbb_/status/1920590815472108021/photo/4 RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The person on Twitter quite clearly states that he is the author of the photo. I don't know where you are getting "video" from. Darth Stabro (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, photograph. Yann (talk) 16:56, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no reason to question this. It's a real person who works for a small but niche and apparently reliable newspaper/blog. The images don't seem to have been taken from any video, and the author claims to be a correspondent in Rome, so a quick run would be enough to reach the square where the photo was taken. The rationale behind the speedy deletion, done by you, already shows that whoever wrote it had no idea what they were doing, and apparently you repeated that lack of understanding by again claiming it was from a video. I've seen no indication so far that this is a licensing laundering scheme. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in several files

The following files uploaded by user Quick1984 violate copyright and should be removed:

This photo was taken during a performance at the "Center for Drama and Directing". (original name: Центр драматургии и режиссуры). The theatre's official website states that photography and video recording are prohibited: In order to ensure the protection of copyright and other related rights, photography, film, video, television shooting, and any type of audio recording of performances or their fragments without special permission from the theater administration are prohibited. (original link name on web-page: "Правила посещения театра") (original text: "В целях обеспечения охраны авторских и иных смежных прав фото-, кино-, видео-, телесъёмка, любые виды аудиозаписи спектаклей или их фрагментов без специального разрешения администрации театра запрещены."). There is no reason to believe that such permission was given to this Wikipedia member. DigitalSpace (talk) 18:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DigitalSpace: If you think there is a real issue, please create a regular deletion request. This is not a reason for speedy deletion. But be aware that making false warnings on Quick1984's files because they question the copyright and information of your files may be seen as retaliation, and you may be blocked for that. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not have the goal of quick deletion and I did not pursue the participant (he himself initiated actions against me and I paid attention to the files he uploaded). Tell me which template to use in this case? DigitalSpace (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DigitalSpace: The best is to create one mass-deletion for all files using Help:VFC. Yann (talk) 18:51, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you! DigitalSpace (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you. DigitalSpace (talk) 18:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As long as my files is the minor part of Category:Center for Drama and Directing, this discrimination is a direct retaliation attempt, coupled with accusations of lying, mirroring warnings, etc. I suppose it's the right time for an administrative action. Quick1984 (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is your actions that I regard as harassment, which I reported to @Yann after your constant attempts to delete my files specifically. DigitalSpace (talk) 19:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) This looks like a case of under COM:CSM of "Museum and interior photography" and Yann is correct that speedy deletion is not appropriate for it. Abzeronow (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete File:Astronomica splash pad.jpg

It was incorrectly cited for copyright violation by Wikipedia user wdwd

I properly opened a dispute with email to commons-copyvio@wikimedia.org citing I am the author. And this was previously published in my bioreconstruct accounts as

Twitter/X https://x.com/bioreconstruct/status/1914104660606005623

Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/bioreconstruct.bsky.social/post/3lnbtr6j4js27

Mastadon https://mastodon.social/@bioreconstruct/114372975280023891

Please correct this mistake. Restore the image and its use in this Wikipedia page, where I have other donated images

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Epic_Universe Gfgbeach (talk) 12:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gfgbeach: If you sent a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, it will be undeleted when the permission is validated by a volunteer. It may take some time. Yann (talk) 17:29, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elşad İman uşağı ilə.jpg

Your speedy undeletion of this file is absolutely out of process. I was the closing administrator at the end of a valid deletion request and I was not notified that an undeletion request had even been opened. At a minimum, the discussion should have been kept open for sufficient time to allow other users to comment. A new DR has been opened up, so I'm not going to ask you to reverse your closure, but I will add again that I feel like this was inappropriate. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@IronGargoyle: Well, this is clearly not a COM:ADVERT. I don't think your reason for deletion is valid. There was a proper undeletion request for a good picture with a proper license and permission, so I don't see the issue. Yann (talk) 17:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Заметка газеты «Вечерняя Москва» об аварии на станции «Авиамоторная» Московского метрополитена.jpg

Hi, Yann. Could you, please, send me the last code of file description for ru-wiki-discussion ru:Википедия:Заявки_на_снятие_флагов#TheDanStarko:_флаг_загружающего? Alex Spade (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Spade: I am not sure I understand what you want, but the file is available at [1]. Yann (talk) 19:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... He altered image. That is no good.
Thank you for file, but I want wiki-code from file page ({{Information}}, license tag, etc.). Alex Spade (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Spade: Ah OK. Here it is. Yann (talk) 19:52, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

=={{int:filedesc}}==
{{Information
|description={{en|1=About escalator's crash on “Aviamotornaya” station of Moscow Metro}}
|date=2021-01-20
|source=https://life.ru/p/1354866
|author={{Unknown|author}}
|permission=
|other versions=
}}

=={{int:license-header}}==
{{cc-zero}}

[[Category:Vechernyaya Moskva]]
[[Category:Newspapers of the Soviet Union, 1982]]

Thank you! Alex Spade (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Billboards

Hello, what is the reason these photos were deleted from the server: File:Billboard Tomislava Jonjića.jpg, File:Billboard Tomislava Tomaševića.jpg, File:Billboard Mislava Hermana.jpg, File:Billboard Davora Bernardića.jpg? M3zzz00 (talk) 19:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@M3zzz00: These are derivative works of non free content, so we can't have them on Commons. Yann (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

--Bedivere (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere: This is ridiculous. Adamant1 comes into dispute with everyone, and gets a safe escape. And then I am blocked. :((( Yann (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry @Yann. I think you both are great assets to the project as I wrote at ANU. However this dispute has gotten worse and worse and that block you imposed on Adamant was totally off. This probably isn't the ideal outcome but it might help cool off things. :( Bedivere (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere: I believe that Adamant should be indefinitely blocked. This discussion has clearly demonstrated that he is not able to discuss peaceful with many other contributors, not just me. He was blocked several times for that. He insulted Abzeronow, that's why I stepped in. Please see comments by Chris.sherlock2, Dronebogus, Jonatan Svensson Glad, The Squirrel Conspiracy, Prototyperspective, etc. Isn't that enough? Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One bad admin action, especially one that’s been quickly walked back, does not warrant a block. Desysop, maybe, if the community feels trust is broken. But a block? That’s an extreme overreach. We don’t block admins for making bad calls in good faith. Frankly, this looks more like punitive posturing than sound judgment. An interaction ban might be worth discussing if tensions are high, but Bedivere, I urge you to reconsider this. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on ANU this is not meant to be punitive but rather to help Yann cool off, and I do trust them as an admin. I don't want this block to mean Yann is unfit (I don't think they are) and for that reason I am lifting it, but I strongly suggest Yann to avoid participating in the discussion any further Bedivere (talk) 16:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And to be clear, I actually support the admin action Yann took against Adamant1, even if he may have been technically involved. I consider myself largely uninvolved here, apart from having been on the receiving end of Adamant1’s behavior myself once, which I’ve already mentioned at the AN/U discussion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:18, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to both of you. I will stay off this issue for a while. Yann (talk) 18:24, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool off? Yann hasn’t been the aggressor here! This is an unjustified block. This is most unwise and you’ve not deescalated anything. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

His block on Adamant was not wise, anyway. The block was not meant to punish Yann, either. I think (I really hope) Yann understood the reasoning behind the block. I've got great consideration of Yann as an admin, and I do not wish their reputation be tarnished by an endless conflict with a rather troublesome user, who is also a great asset to the project although their attitude is not the best. Bedivere (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christ, I missed the block Yann performed. That puts this in a different light. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere and Chris.sherlock2: : FYI I blocked Adamant1 because he was harassing me and edit-warring with me on my talk page, not because of his general behavior. For that, I would apply a much longer block. Yann (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t disagree you were being harassed, but it would have been better to let another admin sort it out. FWIW, it was wrong of Adamant1 to have treated you that way. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 01:04, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bedivere and Chris.sherlock2: : Yes, I agree that I should have let someone else taking care of that. But I opened the thread on ANU on May 4th, and I expected to be taken care much sooner. Yann (talk) 16:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can’t help you with that as I’m not an admin :-) - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:37, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And in response to [2], I want to say:

Sorry, but this looks ridiculous to me. We have 178 admins (OK, many are not active, but still). Can't we find at least one who is not involved? Users who get into dispute with everyone gets a safe escape this way. Actually, this is one more reason to block Adamant1. Yann (talk) 16:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zmago Jelinčič picture

Hi, I'd like to say that the picture of the slovenian politician Zmago Jelinčič Plemeniti was unfairly removed, since it was his official portrait from the National Assembly and the picture is in in public domain and intended to use without copyright problems. So if you could, could you kindly revert the changes made on the page. Noogometni urejevalec (talk) 20:55, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Noogometni urejevalec: We need evidence of that. Please note that being an official portrait doesn't mean it is automatically in the public domain. So we need a formal written permission from the copyright holder. If you have such a permission, please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

monumento resistenza

Hi Yann, sorry for the inconvenience, I just noticed that File:Monumento alla Resistenza, Cuneo.jpg had already been reuploaded by the author as File:WLM-IT Monumento Resistenza, Cuneo.jpg, I'd keep this last one, since it's already in use in some wikimedia projects... Friniate (talk) 17:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted. Yann (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion issue

Bro, why do my own pictures get deleted? How can I protect them? And what license is required for my own pictures? Note: I'm new to Wikipedia. Rahmat Rumon (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahmat Rumon: Your files were deleted because of copyright violations. Now you are blocked for 3 months because you continued to upload them after your first block. Now you have time to read about Commons policies, starting at COM:L and COM:SCOPE. Yann (talk) 15:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Encore l'obsession pour The Enchanted World

Bonjour Yann. Désolé de te déranger avec ça mais j'ai encore maille à partir avec L'IP qui persiste à ajouter une catégorie fantôme et inutile (entre autres). Je me permets de revenir à chaque fois vers toi car tu connais la situation et tu as réagi à chaque fois. Merci beaucoup d'avance. Mel22 (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done The blocage précédent n'était pas suffisant. Bloqué pour 3 ans. Yann (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katherina Kubenk.jpg

Faster than Thunder (talk) 04:32, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will answer on your talk page. Yann (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion

Hi. You deleted File:لما جبريل أثناء تقديم إحدى حلقات بودكاست حكايات مع لما.jpg but VRT has received a ticket for that file. Can you please restore it? Nemoralis (talk) 02:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nemoralis:

Done. Please give the ticket number next time. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files

Hi

Could you see if some files deleted (see tags in my user talk page) could be restaured per February's undeletion request related to Fanta? Panam2014 (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: These are aluminum cans, not bottles, so I doubt the same rationale could be used. May be you could ask Carl Lindberg? Yann (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, so I can't see deleted files. You can't copy product photos off the web (the photo itself has a copyright regardless if it's a derivative work or not). But for Ets-Hokins not sure a can is much different than a bottle. Question is more if the photo is focusing on the copyrighted expression or not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Carl Lindberg: They are images like File:Fanta grape 325ml can-front PNr°0882.jpg and File:Fanta raspberry 330ml can-front PNr°0853.jpg.

I undeleted some files, and created regular DRs instead: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fanta 4 (49506388821).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thai Fanta (4448806322).jpg. Yann (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think those are fine, though you may have divided opinions among admins who decide things. To me, it's if the photo is trading off the actual artistic expression present, which in that case is not the lettering but the other graphic bits, and not sure that really is. Photos where the logo is maybe off-center a bit makes it a bit more obvious it's focusing on the product and not the logo, but I'd still lean they are fine. There are very few bright lines when it comes to copyright though so there is almost never certainty. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:30, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Carl Lindberg: Thanks a lot for your input. In view of your answer, I undeleted some files and created a new DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fanta cans. Yann (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Perpendicular bisector proof la.svg

Hi, File:Perpendicular bisector la.svg and File:Perpendicular bisector proof la.svg are my first works so I apologize for my error and I beg you to explain how to resolve. Dimitris131 made these images: File:Perpendicular bisector el.svg and File:Perpendicular bisector proof el.svg respectively. Their license is {{PD-self}} , so I pick them and change the greek letters with roman ones because I need them for italian wikipedia. As you can see, I put a link to the original works in "source", but I don't know if it is the right place. Further, I used PD-chart instead of PD-self, because they aren't technically made by me, but author allows changes.

Thank you for the advice. Best regards, Emmanuhel (talk) 16:50, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Emmanuhel: This is in the public domain as simple geometric shape, but you still has to provide a license. I did for you this time. Yann (talk) 17:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Emmanuhel (talk) 17:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The block you did

Hello @Yann you blocked an account per request at COM:AN/B. The sock account with the name Beh**chd isn't an appropriate word. That is an abusive word in romanized version of Hindi language. This certainly was made with a malicious intent to mock the community. Maybe vanishing it will work? Shaan Sengupta^Talk 03:13, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File deleted

Hello Yann, hope you are well. I just noticed you that a file I uploaded was deleted for copyright violation. First, I want to sincerely apologize—it was not my intention to upload content that violated any rules. I was under the impression that it could be uploaded under Fair Use, as it was related to the subject of Jean de Meuron's IMDb page. I do not have contact with the subject, but establish copyright license and would like to know if there is any way I could re-upload the image without violating copyright terms? I would really appreciate your guidance on how to do this properly. Repsjared (talk) 10:24, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Şəkil bərpası

Salam. Bu hesab Ahmed Gozala mexsusdur. Sekli berpa edin zehmet olmasa Ahmed Gozal (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This account belongs to Ahmed Gozal. Please restore the photo at the link. File:Ahmed_Gozal.jpg. Ahmed Gozal (talk) 10:52, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmed Gozal: Hi, Wikimedia projects are not social media. We do not accept personal images unless people contribute somehow. Also please read COM:SCOPE. Yann (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Yann, even though I am an unimportant person here on the Commons, I notice all the work you do that keep this place functioning. You do things that other admins don't bother with. With much appreciation, Krok6kola (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elşad İman uşağı ilə.jpg

You have no business closing this deletion request. You voted on the deletion request and also closed the undeletion request of the same file (speedily closing the request without any chance for discussion). If you do not immediately reverse your closure and allow another administrator to close the discussion, I will bring up this repeated misconduct to COM:AN/U. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@IronGargoyle: Hi, Why does the deletion of this file seem so important to you (and to others)? This is a good portrait used in two articles, so it is in scope. There is a license verified by a VRT permission. I don't understand your insistence, nor your aggressiveness. First closure by Krd was Kept, and the repeated nomination by Yousiphh without any new argument seems abusive to me. Yann (talk) 16:13, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Thomas C. Lea III - That Two-Thousand Yard Stare - Original.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas C. Lea III - That Two-Thousand Yard Stare - Original.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]