Jump to content

User talk:Llez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Llez!













FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bathtubs - Caux 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bathtubs - Caux 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte gracilis ssp. convexior, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parthenocissus tricuspidata - Vevey 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Fourchette - Jean-Pierre Zaugg - Vevey 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:45, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to Nikolai Gogol - Anatoliy Valiev - Vevey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
In the top-right corner, there is a triangular area with missing image data after the rotation. Please crop it out --Jakubhal 05:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 08:18, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planets - Les Pléiades 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte gracilis ssp. convexior, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vevey - CGN 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vevey - CGN 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vevey - CGN 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ze Fork - Vevey 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte gleuei, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flexopecten hyalinus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Righi de Vaudois - Glion 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Righi de Vaudois - Glion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Righi de Vaudois - Glion 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qulity --Michielverbeek 06:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 'Vevey' - CGN - Château de Chillon - Veytaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 08:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chapelle St-Joseph du Mont-Pèlerin 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chapelle St-Joseph du Mont-Pèlerin 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte gleuei, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flexopecten hyalinus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flexopecten hyalinus (Hyaline Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veprichlamys jousseaumei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flexopecten hyalinus (Hyaline Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Talochlamys multistriata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit dark but ok. --Plozessor 05:49, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veprichlamys jousseaumei (Jousseaume’s Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamarcka imbricata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:25, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:25, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:00, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Veytaux 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:24, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Talochlamys multistriata (Tinted Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anadara notabilis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Suisse et Majestic - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 07:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort de Chillon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glion railway station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamarcka imbricata (Mossy Ark Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astarte borealis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Van Hool ExquiCity 18 Trolley - Montreux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Van Hool ExquiCity 18 Trolley - Montreux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Van Hool ExquiCity 18 Trolley - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Hôtel Suisse Majestic Montreux, sea side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara notabilis (Röding, 1798) sensu Nordsieck 1969 (Eared Ark), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quincy Jones - Marco Zeno - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlos Santana - Marco Zeno - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Parthenocissus tricuspidata - Vevey 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parthenocissus tricuspidata - Vevey 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte borealis, rounded shape, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tugonia anatina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ray Charles - Marco Zeno - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ella Fitzgerald - Danièle Lauffer - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Claude Nobs - Andreas Altmann - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrogastra plicatula nana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spisula elliptica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aretha Franklin - Marco Zeno - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B. B. King - Marco Zeno - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tugonia anatina, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spisula elliptica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula elliptica (Elliptical Surf Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atactodea striata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spisula elliptica (Elliptical Surf Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atactodea striata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Allerheiligen - Oppenau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Allerheiligen - Oppenau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atactodea striata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Allerheiligen - Oppenau 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Allerheiligen - Oppenau 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Allerheiligen - Oppenau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vladimir Nabokov - Philipp and Alexander Rukavishnikov - Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atactodea striata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehrenmal Schwarzwaldverein - Allerheiligen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehrenmal Schwarzwaldverein - Allerheiligen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Allerheiligen - Oppenau 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Phasmoconus lynceus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phasmoconus lynceus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. biradiata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barockgarten Kloster Allerheiligen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Too much sharpener and a distracting shadow on the bottom right, probably you could reedit it if others agree with me?--Горбунова М.С. 08:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Corrections done. New version from RAW --Llez 09:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Love this new version!--Горбунова М.С. 09:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barockgarten Kloster Allerheiligen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barockgarten Kloster Allerheiligen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. biradiata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Note: halos around metal fence on left.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now, thank you,--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla picta, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 08:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattenstein - Allerheiligen - Oppenau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattenstein - Allerheiligen - Oppenau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Studentenfelsen - Allerheiligen - Oppenau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 14:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla picta, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis (Thin Tellin), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lierbach - Grindenbach - Allerheiligen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis (Thin Tellin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis var. aurantia (Thin Tellin), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Château de Chillon - Veytaux 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château de Chillon - Veytaux 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis var. aurantia (Thin Tellin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis var. flavescens (Thin Tellin), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis var. flavescens (Thin Tellin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macomangulus tenuis 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis var. alba (Thin Tellin), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardites antiquatus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardites antiquatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allerheiligen-Wasserfälle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macomangulus tenuis var. alba (Thin Tellin), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Niklaus-Kapelle - Gstaad 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cardites antiquatus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carditamera floridana 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cardites antiquatus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carditamera floridana 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carditamera floridana (Broad-ribbed Cardita), grey form, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chione elevata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carditamera floridana (Broad-ribbed Cardita), grey form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardita rufescens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chione elevata (Florida Cross Barred Venus), fossil right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)}}[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardita rufescens 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cardita rufescens var. senegalensis (Senegal Cardita), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)}}[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cardita rufescens var. senegalensis (Senegal Cardita), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)}}[reply]

Set Promoted to FP

[edit]
This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Coat of arms on the windows of St. Niklaus Gstaad, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Coat of arms on the windows of St. Niklaus Gstaad has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/--Cart (talk) 21:48, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]







Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlanta brunnea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peronidia albicans 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitonium idalium, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anadara inaequivalvis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peronidia albicans, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cubitostrea plicata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Set FP Promotion

[edit]
This set has been promoted to Featured picture!

The set Mirapecten mirificus, that you nominated on Mirapecten mirificus has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/--KTC (talk) 21:27, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara inaequivalvis (Natal’s Ark), fossil right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cubitostrea plicata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cubitostrea plicata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cubitostrea plicata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astarte excavata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 06:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acrosterigma maculosum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinctada nigra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:La Suisse - CGN 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Suisse - CGN 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acrosterigma maculosum, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte excavata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinctada nigra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pinctada nigra, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dallocardia radula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pinctada nigra, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dallocardia radula 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dallocardia radula (Panama Thorny Cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dallocardia radula (Panama Thorny Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Varicorbula gibba (Common Basket-shell), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Varicorbula gibba (Common Basket-shell), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fragum fragum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corbula scaphoides, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fragum fragum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragum fragum (White Strawberry Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fragum erugatum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose I may be very wrong here because there are two supporting votes already, but this photo looks rather blurry with little detail, which is quite unusual for a QI, especially with focus stacking. In addition, if this is an image from focus stacking, why is the template {{Focus stacked image}} missing? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:41, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Info I know the faint blurriness, but the specimen has only 1.3 cm in hight, please consider the considerable magnification factor of such a small object on your screen; I categorized this picture - as about 3.500 pictures before - besides others, in the Category:Focus stacking images of Mollusca, so I think it is therefore obvious, that it is a focus stacked image. --Llez 12:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for the explanation. The image looks ok at 2 MPx, but at full resolution it is quite blurry, which might be alright at this very high resolution, though. I am not sure whether the template should be used. So I removed my vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)~
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papillicardium papillosum, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fragum erugatum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:16, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragum erugatum, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erronea pyriformis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fragum erugatum, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cellana flava 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erronea pyriformis (Pear-shaped Cowrie), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montfortista excentrica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cellana flava, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laevicardium crassum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Duplicaria dussumierii 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duplicaria dussumierii 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montfortista excentrica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laevicardium crassum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevicardium crassum ssp. mediterraneum (Norwegian egg cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plicatula gibbosa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevicardium crassum ssp. mediterraneum (Norwegian egg cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardita calyculata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plicatula gibbosa, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardita calyculata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cardita calyculata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardita calyculata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cardita calyculata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gibberula sebastiani, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chama punctata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isognomon ephippium (Saddle Tree Oyster), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chama punctata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conus gloriamaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mastonia algens, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callistocypraea aurantium (Golden Cowrie), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus gloriamaris, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chama brassica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iniforis formosula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chama brassica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chama brassica (Cabbage Jewel Box), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chama brassica (Cabbage Jewel Box), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spondylus varius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capulus irregularis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spondylus varius 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acesta rathbuni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus varius, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spondylus varius, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acesta rathbuni 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Havenwelten - Bremerhaven 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Havenwelten - Bremerhaven 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acesta rathbuni (Rathbun’s Giant Lima), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acar abdita 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acesta rathbuni (Rathbun’s Giant Lima), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mastoniaeforis speciosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timoclea ovata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timoclea ovata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acar abdita, right valve, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timoclea ovata var. paucicostata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timoclea ovata var. paucicostata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gafrarium divaricatum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acteocina sandwicensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venus nux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gafrarium divaricatum (Forked Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venus nux, left valve, fossil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polititapes vetulus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problem in VI

[edit]

Thank you for your comments and your good care in VI. I'm trying to quit coffee but... it's not easy and it shows. {{smile}} Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cylichna aethiopica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Conus gloriamaris 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Conus gloriamaris 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polititapes vetulus, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clausinella basteroti, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mnestia girardi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timoclea ovata var. marmorata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timoclea ovata var. marmorata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circenita callipyga 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Callista laevigata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Circenita callipyga, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callista laevigata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapes sulcarius (Furrowed Venus), juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium var. radiata, (Saddle Oyster), yellow form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium var. radiata, (Saddle Oyster), orange form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium var. radiata, (Saddle Oyster), purple form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Finella pupoides, shell, slender shape.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chattonia triangularis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meroena multisulcata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chattonia triangularis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meroena multisulcata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meroena multisulcata, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meroena multisulcata, juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Striarca lactea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Striarca lactea 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Wieskirche 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wieskirche 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vertigo angustior, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Striarca lactea, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Striarca lactea, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asaphis violascens 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carychium tridentatum (Long-toothed Herald Snail), fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Septifer cumingii, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asaphis violascens (Pacific Asaphis), yellow form, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anadara transversa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'', shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara transversa (Transverse Ark Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grandma and grandpa with stuffed bunny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anadara transversa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara transversa (Transverse Ark Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valvata alpestris, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxytoma spec. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Subulina octona 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbatia perinesa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Subulina octona, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia perinesa, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grammatodon muensteri, internal mould.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Planorbis sibiricus, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Striarca symmetrica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lirophora paphia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 05:44, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Altdahn - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Grafendahn - Dahn - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Tanstein - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enantiostreon multicostatum, juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahner Burgengruppe - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 05:54, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Altdahn - Dahn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lirophora paphia (King Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glycymeris deshayesi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ritter - Dahn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Grafendahn - Dahn - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Excellichlamys spectabilis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buntsandstein - Hinterweidenthal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte opalina, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hôtel Fairmont Le Montreux Palace 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hôtel Fairmont Le Montreux Palace 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 29.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 29.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glorichlamys aff. elegantissima 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 04:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Excellichlamys spectabilis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 08:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buntsandstein - Hinterweidenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycymeris deshayesi, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Excellichlamys spectabilis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teufelsschmiede - Hinterweidenthal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some CA at the branches at the left side to remove --Ermell 05:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done THanks for the review --Llez 05:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:42, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teufelsschmiede - Hinterweidenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some CA at the branches at the left side to remove --Ermell 05:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done THanks for the review --Llez 05:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:42, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Grafendahn - Dahn - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Excellichlamys spectabilis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindapecten muscosus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glücksschwein von Schwetzingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindapecten muscosus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Torpfosten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 05:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Torpfosten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 05:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirapecten rastellum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Mittelbau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:41, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Ehrenhofflügel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Eingang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamarcka avellana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Puttenbassin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:36, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Gartenvase 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:46, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Mittelbau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbatia virescens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Zirkelbau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Arionbrunnen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Arionbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teufelsschmiede - Hinterweidenthal 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamarcka avellana, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirapecten rastellum, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ritter - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barbatia virescens 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Laubengang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Zirkelbau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia virescens, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cryptopecten nux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindapecten muscosus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia virescens, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:View of the Upper Rhine Plain from Battenberg Castle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of the Upper Rhine Plain from Battenberg Castle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gloripallium speciosum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:11, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Wandelgang 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Wandelgang 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Wandelgang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cryptopecten nux, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 06:26, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 06:26, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gloripallium speciosum, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]